Am J Physiol Cell Physiol AJP: Renal Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 295: C1071-C1082, 2008. First published August 13, 2008; doi:10.1152/ajpcell.00040.2008
0363-6143/08 $8.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Corrigendum
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
295/5/C1071    most recent
00040.2008v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jing, M.
Right arrow Articles by Ismail-Beigi, F.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jing, M.
Right arrow Articles by Ismail-Beigi, F.

RECEPTORS AND SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION

Stimulation of glucose transport in response to activation of distinct AMPK signaling pathways

Ming Jing,1 Vinay K Cheruvu,2 and Faramarz Ismail-Beigi1,3

1Department of Medicine, 2Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, and 3Department of Physiology and Biophysics, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio

Submitted 28 January 2008 ; accepted in final form 28 July 2008

AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) plays a critical role in the stimulation of glucose transport in response to hypoxia and inhibition of oxidative phosphorylation. In the present study, we examined the signaling pathway(s) mediating the glucose transport response following activation of AMPK. Using mouse fibroblasts of AMPK wild type and AMPK knockout, we documented that the expression of AMPK is essential for the glucose transport response to both azide and 5-aminoimidazole-4-carboxamide-1-β-D-ribofuranoside (AICAR). In Clone 9 cells, the stimulation of glucose transport by a combination of azide and AICAR was not additive, whereas there was an additive increase in the abundance of phosphorylated AMPK (p-AMPK). In Clone 9 cells, AMPK wild-type fibroblasts, and H9c2 heart cells, azide or hypoxia selectively increased p-ERK1/2, whereas, in contrast, AICAR selectively stimulated p-p38; phosphorylation of JNK was unaffected. Azide's effect on p-ERK1/2 abundance and glucose transport in Clone 9 cells was partially abolished by the MEK1/2 inhibitor U0126. SB 203580, an inhibitor of p38, prevented the phosphorylation of p38 and the glucose transport response to AICAR and, unexpectedly, to azide. Hypoxia, azide, and AICAR all led to increased phosphorylation of Akt substrate of 160 kDa (AS160) in Clone 9 cells. Employing small interference RNA directed against AS160 did not inhibit the glucose transport response to azide or AICAR, whereas the content of P-AS160 was reduced by ~80%. Finally, we found no evidence for coimmunoprecipitation of Glut1 and p-AS160. We conclude that although azide, hypoxia, and AICAR all activate AMPK, the downstream signaling pathways are distinct, with azide and hypoxia stimulating ERK1/2 and AICAR stimulating the p38 pathway.

AMP-activated protein kinase; glucose transporter 1; oxidative phosphorylation; small interfering RNA directed against AS160



Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: F. Ismail-Beigi, Clinical and Molecular Endocrinology, Dept. of Medicine, Case Western Reserve Univ., 10900 Euclid Ave., Cleveland, OH 44106-4951 (e-mail: fxi2{at}case.edu)







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2008 by the American Physiological Society.